FinTech driven green energy transition foreign direct investment and ecological footprint in BRICST countries

0
FinTech driven green energy transition foreign direct investment and ecological footprint in BRICST countries
  • Viglioni, M. T. D., Calegario, C. L. L., Viglioni, A. C. D., & Bruhn, N. C. P. Foreign direct investment and environmental degradation: Can intellectual property rights help G20 countries achieve carbon neutrality? Technol. Soc. 77, 102501 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huo, Y. et al. Carbon footprint of farming practices in farmland ecosystems on the North and Northeast China plains. J. Environ. Manag. 354, 120378 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Murshed, M. An empirical analysis of the non-linear impacts of ICT-trade openness on renewable energy transition, energy efficiency, clean cooking fuel access and environmental sustainability in South Asia. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27, 36254–36281 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. & Wu, P. Influence of fiscal decentralization, fintech, and mineral resources on green productivity of G5 countries. Resour. Polic. 89, 104509 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, M., Pata, U. K., Ahmed, Z. & Zhao, R. Fintech, natural resources management, green energy transition, and ecological footprint: Empirical insights from EU countries. Resour. Polic. 92, 104972 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X. & Khan, I. Dynamics among economic growth, urbanization, and environmental sustainability in IEA countries: The role of industry value-added. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29, 4116–4127 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin, L. et al. The salience of carbon leakage for climate action planning: Evidence from the next eleven countries. Sustain. Product. Consum. 27, 1064–1076 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Su, C.-W., Ali, S. & Chang, H.-L. How China is fostering sustainable growth: The interplay of green investment and production-based emission. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27, 39607–39618 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Croutzet, A. & Dabbous, A. Do FinTech trigger renewable energy use? Evidence from OECD countries. Renew. Energy 179, 1608–1617 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Udeagha, M. C. & Muchapondwa, E. Green finance, fintech, and environmental sustainability: Fresh policy insights from the BRICS nations. Int. J. Sust. Dev. World 30, 633–649 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nenavath, S. Impact of Fintech and green finance on environmental quality protection in India: By applying the semi-parametric difference-in-differences (SDID). Renew. Energy 193, 913–919 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, A., Li, S., Chen, S. & Sun, X. The role of Fintech, natural resources, and renewable energy consumption in Shaping environmental sustainability in China: A NARDL perspective. Resour. Polic. 88, 104464 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y.-J. & Wang, W. Do renewable energy consumption and service industry development contribute to CO2 emissions reduction in BRICS countries?. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26, 31632–31643 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L., Liu, S., Liu, D., Fang, Z. & Xu, H. Modelling and forecasting CO2 emissions in the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) countries using a novel multi-variable grey model. Energy 79, 489–495 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Barut, A., Kaya, E., Bekun, F. V. & Cengiz, S. Environmental sustainability amidst financial inclusion in five fragile economies: Evidence from lens of environmental Kuznets curve. Energy 269, 126802 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H.-H., Hsu, C.-C., Wu, P.-H., Shen, C.-C. & Chen, G.-H. Demystifying the interconnections among natural resources, Fintech, green technologies, and sustainable environment in E-7 nations. Resour. Polic. 90, 104698 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Zheng, K., Xia, F. & Cheng, Z. Fintech, natural resource rents, renewable energy consumption and environmental quality: A perspective of green economic recovery from BRICS economies. Resour. Polic. 89, 104604 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia, A. & Liu, Q. Modelling the asymmetric impact of fintech, natural resources, and environmental regulations on ecological footprint in G7 countries. Resour. Polic. 89, 104552 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Q., Zhao, Z., Liu, Y. & He, Y. Natural resources commodity prices volatility, economic performance and environment: Evaluating the role of oil rents. Resour. Polic. 76, 102548 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, F., Zhou, X., Rahat, B. & Rubbaniy, G. Carbon neutrality target for leading exporting countries: On the role of economic complexity index and renewable energy electricity. J. Environ. Manage. 299, 113558 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Li, L., Sadiq, M. & Chien, F. The impact of non-renewable energy production and energy usage on carbon emissions: Evidence from China. Energy Environ. (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Afshan, S., Ozturk, I. & Yaqoob, T. Facilitating renewable energy transition, ecological innovations and stringent environmental policies to improve ecological sustainability: Evidence from MM-QR method. Renew. Energy 196, 151–160 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., Guan, W., Razzaq, A., Shahzad, M. & An, N. B. Transition towards ecological sustainability through fiscal decentralization, renewable energy and green investment in OECD countries. Renew. Energy 190, 385–395 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Uddin, M., Siddik, A. B., Yuhuan, Z. & Naeem, M. A. Fintech and environmental efficiency: The dual role of foreign direct investment in G20 nations. J. Environ. Manage. 360, 121211 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Wu, Y. & Xiao, J. J. The impact of digital finance on household consumption: Evidence from China. Econ. Model. 86, 317–326 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Luan, L., Wu, W., Zhang, Z. & Hsu, Y. Can digital financial inclusion promote China’s economic growth?. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 78, 101889 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Huo, S., Ni, L., Basheer, M. F., Al-Aiban, K. M. & Hassan, S. G. The role of fintech, mineral resource abundance, green energy and financial inclusion on ecological footprint in E7 countries: New insight from panel nonlinear ARDL cointegration approach. Resour. Polic. 94, 105083 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Raza, S. A. & Shah, N. Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in G7 countries: The role of renewable energy consumption and trade. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25, 26965–26977 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, M., Lu, Z., Zhou, Y. & Wang, J. Threshold and spillovers effects of fintech on China’s energy dependence on fossil fuel. Resour. Polic. 91, 104890 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, S., Song, M., Lim, M. K., Wang, J. & Zhao, J. The development of energy blockchain and its implications for China’s energy sector. Resour. Polic. 66, 101595 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Teng, M. & Shen, M. Fintech and energy efficiency: Evidence from OECD countries. Resour. Polic. 82, 103550 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, W., Aslam, N. & Saeed, R. Exploring the role of fintech development in bridging the gap between green energy transition, energy security, and energy poverty: Empirical investigation for BRI countries. Energy Environ. (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin, Q. & Tan, L. Lighting a green future: The role of FinTech in the renewable energy transition. Sci. Prog. 108, 00368504251323566 (2025).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X., Zhang, Y. & Lee, C.-C. Driving low-carbon energy transition with FinTech: The role of government environmental attention. Energy (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Udeagha, M. C. & Ngepah, N. The drivers of environmental sustainability in BRICS economies: Do green finance and fintech matter?. World Dev. Sustain. 3, 100096 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin, L., Aziz, G., Hussan, M. W., Qadeer, A. & Sarwar, S. Empirical evidence of fintech and green environment: Using the green finance as a mediating variable. Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 89, 33–49 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisha, L. et al. Natural resources, green innovation, Fintech, and sustainability: A fresh insight from BRICS. Resour. Polic. 80, 103119 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, Y., Eweade, B. S., Aghazadeh, S., Bamidele, R. O. & Xu, Y. Pathways to environmental sustainability: Do fintech, natural resources, and environmental patents matter in E-7 nations?. Renew. Energy 247, 122987 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Okere, K. I., Dimnwobi, S. K. & Fasanya, I. O. Pathways to environmental sustainability: Exploring the role of FinTech, natural resources and globalization in North Africa. Int. J. Sust. Dev. World 32, 446–464 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Xian, M. Impact of inclusive growth, environmental policy incentives, fintech and globalization on environmental sustainability in G20 countries. Sustainability 17, 50 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pala, F. & Barut, A. Finansal gelişme, ekonomik büyüme ve enerji tüketiminin çevresel kalite üzerindeki etkisi: E-7 ülkeleri örneği. Anadolu Üniv. Sos. Bilimler Derg/ 21, 347–366 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, Z., Adebayo, T. S., Udemba, E. N., Murshed, M. & Kirikkaleli, D. Effects of economic complexity, economic growth, and renewable energy technology budgets on ecological footprint: The role of democratic accountability. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29, 24925–24940 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharif, A., Baris-Tuzemen, O., Uzuner, G., Ozturk, I. & Sinha, A. Revisiting the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on Turkey’s ecological footprint: Evidence from Quantile ARDL approach. Sustain. Cities Soc. 57, 102138 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao, Y. & Chen, P. Do renewable energy consumption and green innovation help to curb CO2 emissions? Evidence from E7 countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30, 21115–21131 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. & Khan, I. Energy use, energy access, and oil price fluctuations as new determinants of environmental quality in APEC countries. Gondwana Res. 132, 309–322 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, M., Ma, N. & Chen, Q. Has green finance policy promoted ecologically sustainable development under the constraints of government environmental attention?. J. Clean. Prod. 450, 141854 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D., Mohsin, M., Rasheed, A. K., Chang, Y. & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. Public spending and green economic growth in BRI region: Mediating role of green finance. Energy Polic. 153, 112256 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, M., Degirmenci, T., Erdem, A., Sogut, Y. & Demirtas, N. From public policy towards the green energy transition: Do economic freedom, economic globalization, environmental policy stringency, and material productivity matter?. Energy 311, 133404 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, R. & Liu, Y. Natural resources as a source of financing energy poverty reduction? resources extraction perspective. Resour. Polic. 82, 1–27 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, S. T., Wang, P., Khan, I. & Zhu, B. The impact of economic complexity, technology advancements, and nuclear energy consumption on the ecological footprint of the USA: Towards circular economy initiatives. Gondwana Res. 113, 237–246 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C., Ren, X., Wang, Z. & Yan, C. Heterogeneous impacts of renewable energy and environmental patents on CO2 emission—evidence from the BRIICS. Sci. Total Environ. 668, 1328–1338 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, H., Weili, L., Bibi, R., Sumaira, & Khan, I. Innovations, energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions in the global world countries: An empirical investigation. J. Environ. Sci. Econom. 1, 12–25 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, H., Xie, N., Fang, D. & Zhang, X. The role of renewable energy consumption and commercial services trade in carbon dioxide reduction: Evidence from 25 developing countries. Appl. Energy 211, 1229–1244 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolük, G. & Mert, M. The renewable energy, growth and environmental Kuznets curve in Turkey: An ARDL approach. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 52, 587–595 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, B. et al. Do green innovation, ICT, and economic complexity matter for sustainable development of BRI economies: Moderating role of higher education. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30, 57833–57849 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. Energy access challenge and the role of fossil fuels in meeting electricity demand: Promoting renewable energy capacity for sustainable development. Geosci. Front. 15, 101873 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, P. Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Economet. Theor. 20, 597–625 (2004).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C. Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. J. Econom. 90, 1–44 (1999).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund, J. New simple tests for panel cointegration. Economet. Rev. 24, 297–316 (2005).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, J. & Kraay, A. Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent data. Rev. Econ. Stat. 80, 549–560 (1998).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumitrescu, E.-I. & Hurlin, C. Testing for granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ. Model. 29, 1450–1460 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Xuan, D., Jiang, X. & Fang, Y. Can globalization and the green economy hedge natural resources? Functions of population growth and financial development in BRICS countries. Resour. Polic. 82, 103414 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • De Hoyos, R. E. & Sarafidis, V. The testing for cross-sectional dependence in panel data model. Stand. Genom. Sci. 6, 482–496 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M. General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics (2004).

  • Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A. & Yamagata, T. A bias-adjusted lm test of error cross-section independence. Economet. J. 11, 105–127 (2008).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Essandoh, O. K., Islam, M. & Kakinaka, M. Linking international trade and foreign direct investment to CO2 emissions: Any differences between developed and developing countries?. Sci. Total Environ. 712, 136437 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. Effect of natural resources on economic growth in Pakistan: A time series analysis. Asian J. Econ. Model. 9, 29–47 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M. H. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl. Econom. 22, 265–312 (2007).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chishti, M. Z. & Sinha, A. Do the shocks in technological and financial innovation influence the environmental quality? Evidence from BRICS economies. Technol. Soc. 68, 101828 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoechle, D. Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. Stand. Genom. Sci. 7, 281–312 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, M. M. & Alam, K. The roles of globalization, renewable energy and technological innovation in improving air quality: Evidence from the world’s 60 most open countries. Energy Rep. 8, 9889–9898 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad, S., Long, X., Salman, M. & Dauda, L. Effect of urbanization and international trade on CO2 emissions across 65 belt and road initiative countries. Energy 196, 117102 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasir, M. H. et al. Energy security and energy poverty in emerging economies: A step towards sustainable energy efficiency. Front. Energy Res. 10, 834614 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. K. & Rana, A. T. Institutional quality and CO2 emission–output relations: The case of Asian countries. J. Environ. Manage. 279, 111569 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Behera, S. R. & Dash, D. P. The effect of urbanization, energy consumption, and foreign direct investment on the carbon dioxide emission in the SSEA (South and Southeast Asian) region. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 70, 96–106 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, P. K. & Smyth, R. A panel cointegration analysis of the demand for oil in the middle east. Energy Policy 35, 6258–6265 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Opoku, E. E. O., Adams, S. & Aluko, O. A. The foreign direct investment-environment nexus: Does emission disaggregation matter?. Energy Rep. 7, 778–787 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, S. & Sethi, N. The energy consumption-environmental quality nexus in BRICS countries: The role of outward foreign direct investment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29, 19714–19730 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamazian, A., Chousa, J. P. & Vadlamannati, K. C. Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: Evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Polic. 37, 246–253 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, J., Wang, S., Liu, W. & Chu, J. Does migration of pollution intensive industries impact environmental efficiency? Evidence supporting “Pollution haven hypothesis”. J. Environ. Manag. 242, 142–152 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, S., Samadhiya, A., Kumar, A., Luthra, S. & Pandey, K. K. Nexus between fintech, green finance and natural resources management: Transition of BRICS nation industries from resource curse to resource blessed sustainable economies. Resour. Polic. 91, 104903 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Han, M. & Liu, K. Towards sustainable path: Measuring the effectiveness of natural resource utilization, renewable energy resources, fintech, environmental investments, and research & development. Resour. Polic. 93, 105053 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, C., Ma, R. & Chen, P. Impact of mineral resource rents and fin-tech on green growth: Exploring the mediating role of environmental governance in developed economies. Resour. Polic. 89, 104547 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Albornoz, F., Cole, M. A., Elliott, R. J. & Ercolani, M. G. In search of environmental spillovers. World Econ. 32, 136–163 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Q., Ahmad, N. & Zhang, H. Renewable energy and energy poverty: An assessment of India’s progress. Energy 238, 121787 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *