Revised ISO 10218 Safety Standards for Industrial Robots | Automation

Ann Arbor, Michigan—After nearly eight years of work, the Association for Advancing Automation (A3) announces the publication of the revised ISO 10218, the global flagship standard for industrial robot safety. In its first major revision since 2011, these new documents offer a leap forward in ensuring the safety of robotics in industrial environments.

“Working alongside hundreds of global experts, A3 played a pivotal role in shepherding this update to publication, to refine safety requirements in response to evolving automation technologies and workplace demands,” says Jeff Burnstein, A3 president.

The new ISO 10218 Parts 1 and 2 feature extensive updates that focus on making functional safety requirements more explicit rather than implied. This shift enhances clarity and usability, making compliance more straightforward for manufacturers and integrators alike.

In North America, ISO 10218 had been previously adopted as ANSI R15.06 in the United States and CSA Z434 in Canada. Work is underway to adopt the new 10218 in both jurisdictions with new versions of R15.06 and Z434 expected to be released later this year.

Key Updates in ISO 10218 (2025)

ISO 10218 consists of two parts:

• Part 1: Safety Requirements for Industrial Robots (Manufacturers)
• Part 2: Safety Requirements for Industrial Robot Applications and Robot Cells (System Integrators)

Both parts have undergone extensive revisions to address the latest safety challenges and technological advancements, including:

• Clarified functional safety requirements that offer more precise safety guidelines to enhance compliance and risk mitigation.
• Integrated safety requirements for collaborative robot applications that consolidates the previously separate ISO/TS 15066.
• Incorporated safety guidance for manual load/unload procedures and end-effectors (sometimes called end-of-arm tooling or EOAT) from previously separate technical reports (TR 20218-1 and TR 20218-2).
• New robot classifications with corresponding functional safety requirements and test methodologies.
• Cybersecurity requirements pertaining to industrial robot safety.

“This set of safety standards has immense global acceptance, but updates were needed” says Roberta Nelson Shea, global technical compliance officer at Universal Robots and convenor of ISO TC 299 Working Group 3. “This is a pivotal moment for industrial robotics. With automation advancing at lightning speed, we need safety standards that keep pace.”